An increasing number of studies are being released to show that AIDS, which can’t be categorized as a disorder because every instance shows a different combination of symptoms, occurs only in people who test HIV-positive. Before HIV was detected, pneumonia, dementia, herpes-infections, weight loss, tuberculosis, Kaposi’s sarcoma, chronic diarrhea, several lymphomas, yeast infection, and other opportunistic infections were considered different diseases.

イミュニティ

Depending upon whether a patient had previously a deficient immune system or belonged to a specific health hazard group, the signs of the diseases exactly matched those that are now considered AIDS diseases. Before the HIV-AIDS hypothesis, a patient who died from pneumonia, tuberculosis, or a lymphoma expired from the various causes of these ailments. By contrast, a patient who dies from pneumonia now and happens to have antibodies to HIV or p24 in his bloodstream, is automatically labeled and recorded as an AIDS victim.

People who have a low T-cell count in their blood are believed to be immune , but if they continue with the identical condition after testing positive for HIV, they are routinely’sentenced’ to AIDS, with or without clinical signs. There are already over 35 such ailments now which were renamed’AIDS’ in this manner.

知っていましたか?

Among the most recent ones is cervical cancer, which has been the first AIDS disease that could only influence the female gender. This will give the false belief that AIDS is now entering the heterosexual community also. The addition of cervical cancer as an AIDS disease has’improved’ the number of AIDS sufferers among girls quite radically, yet at the same time, it’s’diminished’ the range of ordinary cervical cancers among women. Overall, the mortality rate of these diseases hasn’t changed in any respect.

The claim that a growing number of heterosexuals are now afflicted with AIDS isn’t based on actual science, but ignorance or denial of the truth. The renaming of old diseases as AIDS further supports the hypothesis that the AIDS syndrome is not found in anyone without existence of HIV. By definition, there’s absolutely no AIDS without HIV, no matter how many non-HIV people can die from the same symptoms. Accordingly, anything that even remotely resembles immune deficiency plus HIV currently counts as an AIDS disease, regardless of the fact that AIDS patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma have been reported to have normal immune systems. It’s been argued that wherever there’s HIV, AIDS will be the outcome. However, this debate is heavily flawed.

結論

AIDS-like native diseases existed long prior to the testing of antibodies for HIV has been released. What’s different now is that the older diseases are renamed and’become’ AIDS diseases whenever HIV is found to be present as well. In real terms, however, there aren’t any more AIDS cases with HIV in the world than there are without HIV.